Murdaugh Asks Judge To Toss Homicide Indictments Before April Retrial
Alex Murdaugh's lawyers told a judge Friday that the lead investigator in his murder case testified to a grand jury about bloodstains on a T-shirt and shotgun shells scattered across the family property — details the state's own lab reports and investigators never backed up. Prosecutors admit the errors but argue they don't undo the case.
Case at a glance
- Alex Murdaugh — subject
Next: Judge McCaslin told the court she would issue a written ruling the following week; WCIV reported the decision is due by Nov. 20, 2026. Whatever she decides, Murdaugh's retrial on the murder charges is still set to begin with jury selection April 5, 2027, in Sumter County — prosecutors have said that even if the current indictments are tossed, they can seek new ones from a fresh grand jury in time to keep that date.

What happened at Friday's hearing
On Friday, Nov. 13, 2026, attorneys for Alex Murdaugh appeared before Circuit Court Judge Debra McCaslin in Lexington County, South Carolina, asking her to throw out the indictments that have charged him with murder since July 2022.
The indictments accuse Murdaugh of killing his wife, Maggie Murdaugh, 52, and younger son, Paul Murdaugh, 22, at the family's Moselle property in the South Carolina Lowcountry on June 7, 2021.
Defense attorney Jim Griffin told the court that former State Law Enforcement Division agent David Owen gave the Colleton County grand jury false testimony on two points: that blood spatter was found on a T-shirt Murdaugh wore the night of the killings, and that the same ammunition load used to kill Paul — buckshot in one chamber, large birdshot in the other — was found loaded in guns scattered across the property.
A SLED lab report from November 2021, eight months before Owen testified to the grand jury, found no human blood on the cuttings tested from the shirt, according to FITSNews, which covered the hearing live. No blood evidence was introduced at Murdaugh's original 2023 trial, and prosecutors have acknowledged the ammunition claim was also wrong.
Who's who in the case
Alex Murdaugh, 58, a disbarred South Carolina lawyer, is already serving decades in prison for stealing millions of dollars from clients. He has admitted in court to being a thief and opioid addict but denies killing his wife and son.
Maggie Murdaugh, 52, and Paul Murdaugh, 22, were shot to death at the family's dog kennels on the Moselle property in June 2021.
David Owen is the former SLED agent who led the murder investigation and testified before the grand jury that indicted Murdaugh. He retired abruptly in 2024, not long after being named State Law Enforcement Officer of the Year.
Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian are Murdaugh's defense attorneys. Creighton Waters is the lead prosecutor. Judge Debra McCaslin is presiding over the retrial.
"The blood from his murdered son sprang through the air — it's raining back on him — puts him there." — Jim Griffin, Alex Murdaugh's defense attorney, per CBS News
What the indictments and rulings show
The murder charges against Murdaugh have been in place since a Colleton County grand jury indicted him in July 2022. He was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 2023, but the South Carolina Supreme Court threw out that conviction this year, ruling that former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca "Becky" Hill improperly influenced the jury during the trial.
Murdaugh is now awaiting a second trial on the same two murder counts. Jury selection is set to begin April 5, 2027, in Sumter County, according to FITSNews.
His attorneys asked Judge McCaslin to dismiss the indictments "without prejudice" — a ruling that would wipe out the current charges but let prosecutors return to a new grand jury and seek fresh indictments. Prosecutors have said they would do exactly that if the motion succeeds, and the defense has said it won't try to stop them.
McCaslin did not rule from the bench Friday. She told the court she would issue a written decision the following week.
Separately, Murdaugh remains in prison on earlier convictions for financial crimes against former clients and his own law firm — sentences that run regardless of what happens with the murder case.
What each side told the judge
Defense attorney Jim Griffin argued that the false blood-spatter testimony was the only evidence tying Murdaugh to the exact place and time of the killings. "A phone call doesn't put him there. The video doesn't put him there," Griffin said, according to CBS News. "The blood from his murdered son sprang through the air — it's raining back on him — puts him there."
Griffin asked the judge to send the case back to the start. "What we're asking, your honor, is to reboot — go back to square one," he said, per CBS News.
Prosecutor Creighton Waters told the court the errors did not undermine the broader case, which also included a video Paul Murdaugh recorded near the kennels shortly before the killings in which Alex Murdaugh's voice can be heard — contradicting his earlier claims he wasn't there — along with evidence of the family's debts and Murdaugh's financial crimes nearing exposure. "This is what the agent understood at the time," Waters said, according to CBS News. "And it's ultimately not something that would cause a substantial effect on the grand jury or cast grave doubt when we look at all the other evidence that was presented."
In court filings, prosecutors wrote that "a single mistake is not bad faith," according to the Associated Press, carried by Scripps News and CBS News.
Near the end of the hearing, McCaslin turned to Waters with a question that may hint at where she's leaning: "If you had to go back to the grand jury, could you have it all done and ready to go by April 5th?" she asked, per Scripps News and CBS News.
A second murder case built by the same investigator
This isn't the first time a judge has scrutinized David Owen's work. A judge last year dismissed a different murder case Owen investigated — against Michael Colucci, accused of killing his wife, Sara Colucci — after it came out that Owen never told prosecutors or the defense that Sara Colucci's mother had informed him of a suicide threat her daughter made days before she was found dead by the same method she had described.
At Friday's hearing, Griffin quoted the judge who dismissed that case: "Our courts should demand better from the State. If the State wants to retrieve the defendant, it is to do so only after the State has presented the case to the grand jury, who shall have the benefit of the full measure of evidence in this matter," according to FITSNews.
Prosecutors have drawn a distinction between the two cases: they say Owen is accused of withholding evidence in the Colucci case, while in the Murdaugh case the disputed material involved evidence and reports the defense already had at the original 2023 trial.
Owen retired from SLED in 2024, not long after being named State Law Enforcement Officer of the Year.
What happens next
Judge McCaslin told the court she would issue a written ruling the following week; WCIV reported the decision is due by Nov. 20, 2026. Whatever she decides, Murdaugh's retrial on the murder charges is still set to begin with jury selection April 5, 2027, in Sumter County — prosecutors have said that even if the current indictments are tossed, they can seek new ones from a fresh grand jury in time to keep that date.
How this plays in court
A motion like this carries a high bar: the defense must show the grand jury's decision to indict was "substantially influenced" by the false testimony, not simply that an error occurred — the standard Griffin pushed for and Waters argued against.
Prosecutors conceding two factual errors from their own lead witness, while calling them inadvertent rather than deliberate, puts the "bad faith" question squarely before the judge; honest mistakes typically don't void an indictment, but one becomes harder to wave off when it's the testimony that placed the defendant at the scene.
The defense's strongest point is narrow and specific: without the blood-spatter claim, nothing else presented to the grand jury put Murdaugh physically at the kennels at the moment of the shooting, since the recorded video and phone evidence only establish his presence earlier that evening.
Even a defense win would likely be limited in practice — dismissal without prejudice lets prosecutors walk straight back into a grand jury room, which is why the judge's question about an April 5 deadline may matter more to the case's timeline than the ruling on the motion itself.
- Scripps News: Alex Murdaugh wants murder indictments dismissed, saying agent lied to grand jury
- jaisalmernews.com: Alex Murdaugh Asks Judge to Dismiss Murder Indictments, Saying a SLED Agent Lied to the Grand Jury
- WCIV: Murdaugh defense asks judge to toss murder indictments, citing false grand jury evidence
- CBS News: Alex Murdaugh lawyers say top investigator lied to grand jury, want murder indictments tossed
- FITSNews: LIVE FEED: Murdaugh Defense Asks Judge To Toss Murder Indictments
- ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos: Alex Murdaugh wants murder indictments dismissed, saying agent lied to grand jury