South Carolina Courtroom

Murdaugh Fights To Toss Homicide Indictments Before 2027 Retrial

By the VinniePolitan.tv desk · · How we report

Alex Murdaugh asked a judge to throw out the murder indictments that led to his overturned 2023 conviction, arguing the lead investigator fed a grand jury false claims about blood on his shirt and ammunition on his property. Prosecutors admit errors, but say none rose to the level the law requires to dismiss a case.

Case at a glance

  • Alex Murdaugh — subject

Next: Judge Debra McCaslin did not rule from the bench Friday. She told the parties to expect a written decision within the week, and at the hearing's close asked prosecutor Creighton Waters whether the state could re-present the case to a new grand jury and be "ready to go" in time for the April 5, 2027 retrial date in Sumter County — a question both CBS News and WPTZ flagged as a possible signal of where she is headed. Separately, the DNA testing lab Othram has now received evidence from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails and from her cell phone for new analysis, with results expected within 90 days, according to the Daily Mail.

Every report on the Alex Murdaugh case →

Murdaugh Fights To Toss Homicide Indictments Before 2027 Retrial

A Friday hearing in Lexington County

Alex Murdaugh was back in a South Carolina courtroom on Friday, November 13, 2026, five months before he is set to stand trial a second time for killing his wife and son. He sat unshackled at the defense table in a dark suit, according to the Daily Mail, rocking back and forth as his lawyers argued the state's entire case against him should be thrown out before it ever reaches a jury again.

The motion asks Judge Debra McCaslin to dismiss the 2022 murder indictments outright. Defense attorney Jim Griffin told the court that State Law Enforcement Division agent David Owen, the case's lead investigator, gave a grand jury false testimony that helped secure those indictments in July 2022 — testimony Griffin says never should have existed.

Get the uncensored details I'm not allowed to cover on Facebook.
Vinnie Uncensored: one free email every Sunday.

Two claims are at the center of it. First, that Owen told grand jurors blood spatter from Paul Murdaugh was found on the white T-shirt Alex Murdaugh wore the night of the killings. Second, that Owen said the same mixed load of buckshot and birdshot used to kill Paul was found loaded into guns all over the family's Moselle property. Both CBS News and WPTZ report that neither claim held up — SLED's own lab found no human blood on the shirt, and no gun on the property was loaded the way the murder weapon was.

McCaslin did not rule from the bench. She told both sides to expect a written decision within the week, and asked Waters directly whether the state could return to a new grand jury and still be ready for the April 5, 2027 trial date — a question WPTZ and CBS News both noted may hint at how she's leaning.

The killings that started it all

Maggie Murdaugh, 52, and Paul Murdaugh, 22, were shot to death on June 7, 2021, at the dog kennels on the family's 1,700-acre Moselle estate in Islandton, South Carolina. Alex Murdaugh called 911 that night, saying he had come home from visiting his mother to find their bodies.

Prosecutors say two guns were used — a shotgun to kill Paul and an AR-style rifle to kill Maggie — and that neither weapon has ever been recovered. Murdaugh was convicted of both murders in 2023 and sentenced to life, in a trial prosecutors argued was driven by a motive: that the killings would buy him sympathy and time while he scrambled to hide a financial fraud scheme at his family's law firm from coming apart.

That conviction did not survive. In May 2026, the South Carolina Supreme Court threw it out, ruling that then-Colleton County court clerk Becky Hill had improperly tampered with the jury during the first trial. A retrial was set for April 5, 2027, moved to Sumter County after the original trial venue in Colleton County was scrapped.

"The blood from his murdered son sprang through the air — it's raining back on him — puts him there." — Jim Griffin, Alex Murdaugh's defense attorney, quoted by CBS News and WPTZ

What's actually in the record

Murdaugh has never been charged with a crime related to the blood-spatter or ammunition claims themselves — those are allegations about how prosecutors got the indictment, not new charges. He remains charged with the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh from the original 2022 indictment, the same charges a jury convicted him on in 2023 before that verdict was vacated.

Separately, and not at issue in Friday's hearing, Murdaugh has already pleaded guilty to a string of state and federal financial crimes — stealing millions of dollars from clients and his own law firm — and is serving 27-year and 40-year sentences on those convictions. Those sentences stand regardless of what happens with the murder case.

David Owen, the agent accused of misleading the grand jury in Murdaugh's case, retired abruptly in 2024, shortly after being named State Law Enforcement Officer of the Year. CBS News and WPTZ report that a judge last year threw out an unrelated murder case Owen worked, after finding he failed to tell prosecutors and the defense that the victim's mother had warned him her daughter threatened suicide — in the same manner she was later found dead.

The defense is also waiting on new forensic results. Investigative genetic genealogy lab Othram — the company that helped identify Bryan Kohberger as the suspect in the Idaho student killings — has received DNA evidence from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails and from her cell phone for retesting, with results expected within roughly 90 days, according to the Daily Mail. Prosecutors have called that unidentified male DNA a 'red herring'; the defense says it could point to someone else.

What each side told the court

Griffin, for the defense, argued the false blood claim was the only piece of evidence that placed Murdaugh at the exact place and moment of the killing. 'A phone call doesn't put him there. The video doesn't put him there,' Griffin said, according to CBS News and WPTZ. 'The blood from his murdered son sprang through the air — it's raining back on him — puts him there.'

Griffin told the judge the false testimony 'reverberated' through the community and 'spread like wildfire,' and asked her to let the state start over. 'What we're asking, your honor, is to reboot — go back to square one,' he said, per CBS News.

Waters, for the prosecution, called the blood spatter testimony a 'side issue' and said the indictment rested on stronger ground: a video recovered from Paul Murdaugh's phone that placed Alex Murdaugh's voice at the dog kennels around the time of the murders, directly contradicting his alibi. 'This is what the agent understood at the time,' Waters said of Owen's testimony, according to CBS News. 'And it's ultimately not something that would cause a substantial effect on the grand jury or cast grave doubt when we look at all the other evidence that was presented.'

In court filings, prosecutors conceded errors occurred but drew a legal line: 'a single mistake is not bad faith.' Outside the courtroom, legal analysts were split on the odds. Attorney Aaron Parnas told NewsNation's 'Prime' the defense faces 'a very high bar' but may be laying groundwork for a future appeal if Murdaugh is convicted again. Trial attorney Randolph Rice told NewsNation that even a partial win for the defense — a judicial finding of misconduct short of outright dismissal — would hand Murdaugh's team ammunition to tell a future jury that investigators did sloppy, dishonest work.

Vinnie on air

What Vinnie has said about this case

“You'll remember in the Murdoch case, we had jurors who were interfered with by Becky Hill.”

Vinnie Politan on his show, “Kevin Reddington Attacks!” (September 29, 2026)

“Becky Hill did and then perhaps give him a little bit more of a benefit of a doubt.”

Vinnie Politan on his show, “Murdaugh Wins...Now What... the Tangent Podcast” (May 15, 2026)

What happens next

Judge Debra McCaslin did not rule from the bench Friday. She told the parties to expect a written decision within the week, and at the hearing's close asked prosecutor Creighton Waters whether the state could re-present the case to a new grand jury and be "ready to go" in time for the April 5, 2027 retrial date in Sumter County — a question both CBS News and WPTZ flagged as a possible signal of where she is headed. Separately, the DNA testing lab Othram has now received evidence from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails and from her cell phone for new analysis, with results expected within 90 days, according to the Daily Mail.

The legal read

How this plays in court

To win dismissal, the defense has to clear what legal analysts call a high bar: showing a reasonable grand jury would not have indicted Murdaugh without the disputed testimony about blood spatter and ammunition. Grand juries indict on probable cause alone, a far lower standard than the proof needed to convict, which cuts against the defense.

The prosecution's fallback argument is that the case never rested on the blood evidence in the first place — that the video from Paul Murdaugh's phone placing Alex Murdaugh at the kennels, combined with his lie about his alibi, mounting debts, and missing guns matching the murder weapons, supplied probable cause on its own. Whether a judge agrees the other evidence was independently sufficient will likely decide the motion.

Even a loss on dismissal could still help the defense. Attorney and former prosecutor Randolph Rice told NewsNation that a finding of misconduct, even short of dismissal, gives Murdaugh's team a tool to use in front of an actual trial jury: a basis to argue investigators did sloppy work and were not candid, regardless of the final verdict.

A full dismissal would not end the case. Prosecutors have said they can seek a fresh indictment from a new grand jury without the disputed testimony, and the defense has said it won't try to stop them — meaning the practical effect of winning the motion may be delay and a new round of pretrial argument rather than freedom.

Sources. This report draws on the following coverage; quotes are reproduced as those outlets printed them.
  • Daily Mail: Disgraced legal dynasty heir Alex Murdaugh makes Hail Mary bid to toss murder charges over police 'lies' about damning blood spatter evidence
  • WPTZ: Alex Murdaugh wants murder indictments dismissed, saying agent lied to grand jury
  • NewsNation: Alex Murdaugh bid to dismiss murder case faces long odds, experts say
  • NewsNation: Murdaugh defense team fights to toss murder charges over allegedly false evidence
  • CBS News: Alex Murdaugh lawyers say top investigator lied to grand jury, want murder indictments tossed
Vinnie Politan is a former prosecutor and veteran trial anchor.
Vinnie Uncensored · every Sunday
Get the uncensored details I'm not allowed to cover on Facebook.
One email every Sunday: the week's biggest cases, the real charges, nothing softened. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.